First off, there's my attempt to syntethize, in non-technical language, why it is the current round of WTO negotiations is hopelessly deadlocked:
Second is this short write-up on the way the deadlock is concentrated on just a handful of products:
Next, a note on how the WTO's monstrously convoluted Agricultural Subsidy classification system came into being:
Then, a write-up summing up the outcome of the December 2005 WTO Ministerial Conference in Hong Kong:
My post from Day 4 of the Hong Kong ministerial, explaining the European Union's oddly inflexible position:
My post from Day 3 of the Hong Kong ministerial, noting the developing world's increased engagement with the negotiations:
This post from Day 2 of Hong Kong is an early attempt to deconstruct some of the more baffling aspects of WTO Diplo-bureaucratic jargon - particularly that most slipperly of formulations - "a balanced agreement."